Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/John Michael Sydoriak v. State

John Michael Sydoriak v. State

162 So. 3d 111, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16793, 2014 WL 5149132
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 2014
Docket4D13-2123
StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 111 (John Michael Sydoriak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Michael Sydoriak v. State, 162 So. 3d 111, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16793, 2014 WL 5149132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the trial court’s summary denial of multiple claims for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, and the denial of two other claims after an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the case. The trial court shall allow the defendant a reasonable time to file an amended motion that meets the pleading requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), as to Claim 1 N only, if he can do so in good faith. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); see also Ramos v. State, 141 So.3d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We affirm the case in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alcorn v. State
121 So. 3d 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
Ramos v. State
141 So. 3d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 3d 111, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16793, 2014 WL 5149132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-michael-sydoriak-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.