John Meggs, et al. v. Napoli Enterprise Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 29, 2026·No. 2:26-cv-00254·Unknown

Opinion

3 x ok 4 John Meggs, et al., Case No. 2:26-cv-00254-BNW 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER 6 v. 7 || Napoli Enterprise Inc., 8 Defendant. 9 10 Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time for service. ECF No. 12. Rule 4 11 || provides that plaintiffs must serve defendants “within 90 days after the complaint is filed.” Fed. 12 |} R. Civ. P. 4(m). “[I]f the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure [to serve], the court must 13 |} extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” /d. Courts determine on a case-by-case 14 || basis whether the serving party has shown good cause. U.S. v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less 15 || Bearing a Registered Trademark of Guess?, Inc., 366 F.3d 767, 772 (9th Cir. 2004). Generally, 16 || good cause is equated with diligence. Townsel v. Contra Costa Cnty., Cal., 820 F.2d 319, 320 17 |} (9th Cir. 1987). 18 Here, Plaintiffs have shown good cause because they have diligently attempted service six 19 |] times. ECF Nos. 12-1 and 12-2. Accordingly, this Court will grant Plaintiffs an additional 60 days 20 || to serve Defendant. 21 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to extend the time for service (ECF No. 12) is 22 || GRANTED. Plaintiffs will have until August 3, 2026, to serve Defendant. 23 24 DATED: May 28, 2026 25 .

26 LE gm lea WER, BRENDA WEKSLER □ 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Meggs, et al. v. Napoli Enterprise Inc., (D. Nev. 2026).

John Meggs, et al. v. Napoli Enterprise Inc. (John Meggs, et al. v. Napoli Enterprise Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related