John McZeal v. U.S.A. Processor Unlimited and Leberty Mutual Insurance Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2004
Docket14-03-01080-CV
StatusPublished

This text of John McZeal v. U.S.A. Processor Unlimited and Leberty Mutual Insurance Company (John McZeal v. U.S.A. Processor Unlimited and Leberty Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John McZeal v. U.S.A. Processor Unlimited and Leberty Mutual Insurance Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion filed January 8, 2004

Dismissed and Opinion filed January 8, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-01080-CV

JOHN MCZEAL, Appellant

V.

U.S.A. PROCESSOR UNLIMITED AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03-16881

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 2, 2003.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On December 4, 2003, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).


In response, appellant filed a motion to proceed as an indigent with a supporting affidavit.  However, an appellant must file an affidavit of indigence in the trial court with or before the notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(c)(1); see In re White, 967 S.W.2d 507, 510 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, orig. proceeding) (stating that the rules do not Aprovide for the filing of an affidavit of indigence after an appeal has been perfected.@).

Accordingly, because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk=s record, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed January 8, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re White
967 S.W.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John McZeal v. U.S.A. Processor Unlimited and Leberty Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-mczeal-v-usa-processor-unlimited-and-leberty--texapp-2004.