John McJunkin v. James Jolly Clark
This text of John McJunkin v. James Jolly Clark (John McJunkin v. James Jolly Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant John McJunkin and appellee James Jolly Clark have notified the Court that
they have reached a settlement agreement. In order to effectuate their agreement, the parties jointly request that the Court reverse the judgment in this case and remand to the trial court for further proceedings to implement their settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); Dunn v. Canadian Oil & Gas Servs. Inc., 908 S.W.2d 323, 324 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1995, no writ) (reversing and remanding to effectuate settlement). We grant the motion; without passing on the merits of the appeal, we reverse the trial court's judgment and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
The parties also request that the Court expedite issuance of the mandate. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c). We grant the request. The mandate will issue on the same date as this opinion and judgment. The parties have also stipulated that each party will bear his own costs.
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Reversed and Remanded on Joint Motion
Filed: March 4, 2004
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John McJunkin v. James Jolly Clark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-mcjunkin-v-james-jolly-clark-texapp-2004.