John Martin v. State of Florida
This text of 464 F.2d 1394 (John Martin v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
464 F.2d 1394
John MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 72-1877 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 6, 1972.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; James Lawrence King, Judge.
Donald Bierman, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Nelson F. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's contention that his Miranda warnings were insufficient is completely without merit, and his petition for habeas corpus was appropriately dismissed without an evidentiary hearing.
Affirmed.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 F.2d 1394, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-martin-v-state-of-florida-ca5-1972.