John Martin v. State of Florida

464 F.2d 1394, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 6, 1972·No. 72-1877·Published

Opinion

464 F.2d 1394

John MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 72-1877 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1972.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; James Lawrence King, Judge.

Donald Bierman, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Nelson F. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant's contention that his Miranda warnings were insufficient is completely without merit, and his petition for habeas corpus was appropriately dismissed without an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Martin v. State of Florida, 464 F.2d 1394, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647 (5th Cir. 1972).

464 F.2d 1394 (John Martin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related