JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA v. DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 2022·No. 21-2259·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA, Appellant,

v.

DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE, Appellee.

No. 4D21-2259

[January 5, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Fabienne E. Fahnestock, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE19009654(35)(90).

Jonathan Mann and Robin Bresky of Bresky Law, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court’s decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”).

MAY, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA v. DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA v. DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE (JOHN MARIO GONZALEZ ARTEAGA v. DORIS EDY BEDOYA ALZATE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Esaw v. Esaw
965 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)