John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedJanuary 20, 1998
Docket1102962
StatusUnpublished

This text of John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW (John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW, (Va. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray Argued at Richmond, Virginia

JOHN MADISON, S/K/A JOHN BRADLEY MADISON MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1102-96-2 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY JANUARY 20, 1998 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HANOVER COUNTY Richard H.C. Taylor, Judge R. Craig Evans (McCaul, Martin, Evans & Cook, P.C., on brief), for appellant.

Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

John Bradley Madison (defendant) appeals his conviction for

several burglaries and related offenses, arguing that the

prosecutions violated Code § 19.2-243, the "speedy trial"

statute. We agree and reverse the convictions.

Defendant is familiar with the salient procedural history,

and we recite only those circumstances necessary to a disposition

of this appeal.

Defendant and codefendants, Carlton A. Vaughan, III, and

Gerald E. Baker, Jr., were prosecuted before the trial court for

several burglaries and attendant offenses. Each defendant was

represented by separate counsel, but the respective prosecutions

shared identical procedural courses, together with like motions, * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. arguments, orders and other events pertaining to the speedy trial

issue. Accordingly, each defendant appealed his convictions to

this Court, asserting that Code § 19.2-243 barred the disputed

prosecutions and convictions.

In Baker v. Commonwealth, a panel of this Court concluded

that the Commonwealth had "fail[ed] to provide a speedy trial as

required by Code § 19.2-243" and reversed the convictions of

codefendant Baker. 25 Va. App. 19, 20-21, 486 S.E.2d 111, 112, aff'd en banc, 26 Va. App. 175, 493 S.E.2d ___ (1997).

Finding that Baker controls the disposition of this appeal,

we similarly reverse and dismiss the instant convictions.

Reversed and dismissed.

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. Commonwealth
486 S.E.2d 111 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1997)
Baker v. Commonwealth
493 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-madison-ska-john-bradley-madison-v-cw-vactapp-1998.