John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW
This text of John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW (John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray Argued at Richmond, Virginia
JOHN MADISON, S/K/A JOHN BRADLEY MADISON MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1102-96-2 JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY JANUARY 20, 1998 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HANOVER COUNTY Richard H.C. Taylor, Judge R. Craig Evans (McCaul, Martin, Evans & Cook, P.C., on brief), for appellant.
Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
John Bradley Madison (defendant) appeals his conviction for
several burglaries and related offenses, arguing that the
prosecutions violated Code § 19.2-243, the "speedy trial"
statute. We agree and reverse the convictions.
Defendant is familiar with the salient procedural history,
and we recite only those circumstances necessary to a disposition
of this appeal.
Defendant and codefendants, Carlton A. Vaughan, III, and
Gerald E. Baker, Jr., were prosecuted before the trial court for
several burglaries and attendant offenses. Each defendant was
represented by separate counsel, but the respective prosecutions
shared identical procedural courses, together with like motions, * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. arguments, orders and other events pertaining to the speedy trial
issue. Accordingly, each defendant appealed his convictions to
this Court, asserting that Code § 19.2-243 barred the disputed
prosecutions and convictions.
In Baker v. Commonwealth, a panel of this Court concluded
that the Commonwealth had "fail[ed] to provide a speedy trial as
required by Code § 19.2-243" and reversed the convictions of
codefendant Baker. 25 Va. App. 19, 20-21, 486 S.E.2d 111, 112, aff'd en banc, 26 Va. App. 175, 493 S.E.2d ___ (1997).
Finding that Baker controls the disposition of this appeal,
we similarly reverse and dismiss the instant convictions.
Reversed and dismissed.
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Madison, s/k/a John Bradley Madison v. CW, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-madison-ska-john-bradley-madison-v-cw-vactapp-1998.