John MacInnis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2018·No. 18-1268·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 18-1268

John Kemp MacInnis, Reg #08355-029

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

Submitted: August 28, 2018 Filed: August 31, 2018

[Unpublished]

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate John Kemp MacInnis appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) lawsuit. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to MacInnis, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted to the United States of America based on MacInnis’s failure to provide medical expert testimony in support of his claim of medical negligence, as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 16- 114-206(a). See Day v. United States, 865 F.3d 1082, 1086 (8th Cir. 2017) (to bring FTCA claim, controlling law is that of state where act or omission occurred; discussing requirements of § 16-114-206(a) in medical malpractice case arising in Arkansas). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John MacInnis v. United States, (8th Cir. 2018).

John MacInnis v. United States (John MacInnis v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles Cullor v. John Baldwin
830 F.3d 830 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
Michelle Day v. United States
865 F.3d 1082 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)