John MacHibroda v. United States

280 F.2d 379, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4376
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1960·No. 14087·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered upon appeal from the order of the United States District Court denying the motion to vacate sentences aggregating forty years, imposed for bank robbery.

We think District Judge Kloeb, 184 F.Supp. 881, acted with due discretion in the matter and that, upon the facts confronting him, he properly applied the doctrine of this court pronounced in Johnson v. United States, 6 Cir., 239 F.2d 698, 699, which was quoted by the district judge in his opinion. See, also, Sandroff v. United States, 6 Cir., 174 F.2d 1014. We think the instant case differentiates on its facts from Teller v. United States, 6 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 871.

The order of the United States District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John MacHibroda v. United States, 280 F.2d 379, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4376 (6th Cir. 1960).

280 F.2d 379 (John MacHibroda v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacHibroda v. United States
368 U.S. 487 (Supreme Court, 1962)