John M. Price, Jr. v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, and Attorney General, State of Kentucky, Respondents

815 F.2d 705, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18216
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1987
Docket20-1337
StatusUnpublished

This text of 815 F.2d 705 (John M. Price, Jr. v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, and Attorney General, State of Kentucky, Respondents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John M. Price, Jr. v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, and Attorney General, State of Kentucky, Respondents, 815 F.2d 705, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18216 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

815 F.2d 705

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
John M. PRICE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dewey SOWDERS, Warden, and Attorney General, State of
Kentucky, Respondents- Appellees.

No. 86-6115.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 18, 1987.

Before LEVELY, Chief Judge, WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, and CELEBREEZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After examination of the record and appellant's informal brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant contends that his indictment on a persistent felony offender charge was inadequate because it did not incorporate a previous indictment to which the recidivist charge was applied. However, a recidivist charge is independent of the underlying offense to which it relates. Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448 (1962). A careful review of the record reveals that the persistent felony offender indictment provided appellant fair notice of the recidivist charge against him. See Payne v. Janasz, 711 F.2d 1305, 1312 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1019 (1983); Blake v. Morford, 563 F.2d 248 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1038 (1978).

Therefore, appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied and the judgment of the district court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oyler v. Boles
368 U.S. 448 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Edward Payne v. Joseph Janasz
711 F.2d 1305 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Shanker Industries, Inc. v. 1798 Crawford Road Co
815 F.2d 705 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
815 F.2d 705, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-m-price-jr-v-dewey-sowders-warden-and-attorne-ca6-1987.