John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 29, 2015·No. 04-15-00695-CV·Published

Opinion

Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 29, 2015

No. 04-15-00695-CV

John M. DONOHUE, Appellant

v.

Sergeant Jose HERNANDEZ, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez, Appellees

From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-003-CCL Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

ORDER On December 28, 2015, appellant filed a motion to join all parties in appeal. The motion is DENIED.

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on December 23, 2015. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Any brief filed by appellant must comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez (John M. Donohue v. Sergeant Jose Hernandez, Deputy Matt Krueger, Deputy Birdie Tyler, and Denise Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.