John L. Ward and Richard De Tamble v. Flex-O-Tube Company and Harturn, Inc.
This text of 216 F.2d 954 (John L. Ward and Richard De Tamble v. Flex-O-Tube Company and Harturn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing upon the merits their court action, brought to recover damages for alleged unjust enrichment arising out of a compromise agreement between the defendant appellees and the United States with relation to excess profits taxes, has been duly considered and heard upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and upon the record in the cause:
From all of which it appears that the judgment of the district judge was correct for the reasons stated in his succinct opinion;
Accordingly, the judgment, D.C., 112 F.Supp. 658, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-l-ward-and-richard-de-tamble-v-flex-o-tube-company-and-harturn-inc-ca6-1954.