John L. Hart v. L. A. Baarcke, North Palm Beach Swim Shop and L. A. Baarcke D/B/A North Palm Beach Swim Shop

550 F.2d 353, 202 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 400, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13886
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1977·No. 75-2340·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John L.- Hart, who was the plaintiff in the district court and is the appellant in this Court brought an action for the infringement of a patent for women’s swimsuits. The district court determined that the patent was invalid by reason of obviousness. The facts from which the controversy arose and the reasons for its decision are set forth in the district court’s opinion. Hart v. Baarcke, D.C.Fla., 396 F.Supp. 408. The action was correctly decided and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John L. Hart v. L. A. Baarcke, North Palm Beach Swim Shop and L. A. Baarcke D/B/A North Palm Beach Swim Shop, 550 F.2d 353, 202 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 400, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13886 (5th Cir. 1977).

550 F.2d 353 (John L. Hart v. L. A. Baarcke, North Palm Beach Swim Shop and L. A. Baarcke D/B/A North Palm Beach Swim Shop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
559 F. Supp. 229 (N.D. Alabama, 1983)
Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.
559 F. Supp. 815 (D. Maine, 1981)
I. U. Technology Corp. v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.
641 F.2d 298 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)