John Kyles and Leland Pharmacy v. Ernest Junios
This text of John Kyles and Leland Pharmacy v. Ernest Junios (John Kyles and Leland Pharmacy v. Ernest Junios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 26, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00217-CV ——————————— JOHN KYLES AND LELAND PHARMACY, LLC, Appellants V. ERNEST JUNIOUS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2022-64933
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, John Kyles and Leland Pharmacy, LLC, filed a notice of appeal
from a March 5, 2025 trial court order. Appellants have neither paid the required
fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX.
R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts
of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On April 16, 2025, appellants were notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence
was not established, by May 16, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellants
did not adequately respond.
Further, appellants have not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On May 23, 2025,
appellants were notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellants did
not submit written evidence that appellants had paid or made arrangements to pay
the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by June 23, 2025. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellants did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Kyles and Leland Pharmacy v. Ernest Junios, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-kyles-and-leland-pharmacy-v-ernest-junios-texapp-2025.