John Kraynak v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

283 F.2d 302
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 24, 1960·No. 13231_1·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Section 416(i) (1) of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 620 (1935) as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., provides that the term “disability” shall mean “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment * * * ”. The evidence relating to the issue of whether this claimant was disabled within the terms of the definition stated above was carefully examined and weighed by the trial judge and his conclusions are supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. We therefore cannot set them aside even though we were to reach a different result approaching the matter de novo. The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Kraynak v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 283 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1960).

283 F.2d 302 (John Kraynak v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKay v. Gardner
245 F. Supp. 739 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Boozer v. Celebrezze
238 F. Supp. 701 (W.D. South Carolina, 1964)
Simmons v. Celebrezze
233 F. Supp. 93 (E.D. South Carolina, 1964)
Brill v. Celebrezze
232 F. Supp. 296 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Janek v. Celebrezze
221 F. Supp. 382 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
McCord v. Celebrezze
221 F. Supp. 206 (W.D. South Carolina, 1963)
Edwards v. Celebrezze
220 F. Supp. 79 (W.D. South Carolina, 1963)
Robertson v. Ribicoff
215 F. Supp. 254 (E.D. Louisiana, 1963)
Lippert v. Ribicoff
215 F. Supp. 28 (N.D. California, 1963)
Meola v. Ribicoff
207 F. Supp. 658 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Hilbert v. Flemming
189 F. Supp. 344 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1960)