John Koo-Hyun Kim v. Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Judge Margaret Cooper

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2008
Docket03-07-00309-CV
StatusPublished

This text of John Koo-Hyun Kim v. Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Judge Margaret Cooper (John Koo-Hyun Kim v. Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Judge Margaret Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Koo-Hyun Kim v. Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Judge Margaret Cooper, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00309-CV

John Koo-Hyun Kim, Appellant

v.

Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, and Judge Margaret Cooper, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-000665, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 21, 2007. On December 27, 2007,

appellees informed this Court that on March 23, 2007, the underlying cause was removed to and is

currently pending in federal court. Appellees attached copies of both the notice of removal and an

order signed by the federal court on April 19, 2007, denying appellant’s motion to

reconsider the removal.

Once a case is removed to federal court, state courts may not take any further action.

28 U.S.C.A. § 1446(d) (West 1994); Meyerland Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co., 848 S.W.2d 82, 83

(Tex. 1993). We therefore abate the cause and will treat it as a closed case. The cause may be reinstated if a party files a prompt motion showing that the cause has been remanded to state court

or informing us that the case has been concluded at the federal level.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: February 22, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyerland Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
848 S.W.2d 82 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Koo-Hyun Kim v. Judge Lee Yeakel, Andrew Austin, Jung-Kuen Kim, Tae-Sik Lee, Steve McCrow, Johnny Sutton, Gary L. Anderson, Anthony Brown, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and Judge Margaret Cooper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-koo-hyun-kim-v-judge-lee-yeakel-andrew-austin-jung-kuen-kim-texapp-2008.