John Kimble v. State of Florida
This text of John Kimble v. State of Florida (John Kimble v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D20-3690 _____________________________
JOHN KIMBLE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stephen S. Everett, Judge.
September 22, 2021
PER CURIAM.
John Kimble appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that the trial court imposed a vindictive sentence when he was resentenced pursuant to a successful motion to correct sentencing error. Because the postconviction court properly determined that a vindictive sentencing claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a), we affirm. See Jackson v. State, 193 So. 3d 1, 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Buono v. State, 900 So. 2d 672, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Taylor v. State, 897 So. 2d 495, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
AFFIRMED. RAY, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
John Kimble, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Kimble v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-kimble-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.