John K. Riffle v. United States

299 F.2d 802, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5721
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 1962
Docket19540
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 299 F.2d 802 (John K. Riffle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John K. Riffle v. United States, 299 F.2d 802, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5721 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged, by an information filed in the Northern District of Ohio, with interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. In the Southern District of Florida, he executed a waiver of counsel, a waiver of indictment, a consent to the transfer of the cause, and a plea of guilty. He was given a five-year sentence.

The appellant wrote a letter to the district judge by whom sentence was imposed saying that on the day he appeared in court he had been out of the hospital for only two days and was under the influence of drugs, and had been promised a sentence by a Federal agent and a United States Marshal of one or two years. By the letter the appellant requested he be returned to Ohio for trial. The district court treated the letter as a motion to withdraw the plea of guilty and denied it. We think the letter should have been treated as a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and that, as such, it should have been granted. Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835; Gregori v. United States, 5th Cir. 1957, 243 F.2d 48; Alexander v. United States, 5th Cir. 1961, 290 F.2d 252; Praylow v. United States, 5th Cir. 1962, 298 F.2d 792.

The letter of the appellant to one of the judges of this Court will be treated as a notice of appeal and as an application to appeal in forma pauperis. Such application is granted, and the appeal decided upon the district court record. The order of the district court is vacated and set aside, and the cause is remanded for a hearing upon the mental capacity of the appellant at the time the court accepted his waivers, consent and plea.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
487 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Fred Roberts
749 F.2d 404 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation, General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Petroleum Company, Pennzoil Company, Mississippi River Transmission Corp., Shell Oil Company, Exxon Corporation, Laclede Gas Company, Getty Oil Company, Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Northern Natural Gas Company, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Texaco, Inc., Tenneco Oil Company, Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation, Gulf Oil Corporation, Placid Oil Company, Aminoil, Usa, Inc., Intervenors. Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation, Amoco Production Company, General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Petroleum Company, Pennzoil Company, Exxon Corporation, Shell Oil Company, Tenneco Oil Company, Union Oil Company of California, Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Getty Oil Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Laclede Gas Company, Sun Oil Company, Arco Oil & Gas Company, Placid Oil Company, Texaco, Inc., Gulf Oil Corporation, Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation, General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Petroleum Company, Pennzoil Company, Shell Oil Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Getty Oil Company, Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Texaco, Inc., Exxon Corporation, Sun Oil Company, Tenneco Oil Company, Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation, Gulf Oil Corporation, Placid Oil Company, Intervenors. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mobil Oil Corporation, General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Petroleum Company, Pennzoil Company, Shell Oil Company, Laclede Gas Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Getty Oil Company, Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Texaco, Inc., Sun Oil Company, Chevron, Usa, Exxon Corporation, Tenneco Oil Company, Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation, Gulf Oil Corporation, Placid Oil Company, Intervenors. Lone Star Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Petroleum Company, Pennzoil Company, Shell Oil Company, Laclede Gas Company, Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Getty Oil Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Valero Transmission Company, Texaco, Inc., Exxon Corporation, Sun Oil Company, Tenneco Oil Company, Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation, Gulf Oil Corporation, Placid Oil Company, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., Intervenors. Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Lone Star Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Exxon Corporation, Conoco Inc., General American Oil Company of Texas, Pennzoil Company, Tenneco Oil Company, Union Oil Co. Of California, Getty Oil Company, Aminoil Usa, Inc., Gulf Oil Corporation, Texaco, Inc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation, Shell Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, Sun Exploration and Production Co., Intervenors. Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
756 F.2d 166 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)
Shah v. Hutto
704 F.2d 717 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)
Carl H. Alley v. Dodge Hotel
501 F.2d 880 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
Herman Edward Nelms v. United States
318 F.2d 150 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. William Howard Duncan
310 F.2d 367 (Seventh Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 F.2d 802, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-k-riffle-v-united-states-ca5-1962.