John Johnson, Jr. v. L.E. Bruce, Director of Correctional Facility Steven J. Davies

Tenth Circuit

John Johnson, Jr. v. L.E. Bruce, Director of Correctional Facility Steven J. Davies

961 F.2d 220, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19557, 1992 WL 73045

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1992

Docket91-3271

StatusPublished

This text of 961 F.2d 220 (John Johnson, Jr. v. L.E. Bruce, Director of Correctional Facility Steven J. Davies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Johnson, Jr. v. L.E. Bruce, Director of Correctional Facility Steven J. Davies, 961 F.2d 220, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19557, 1992 WL 73045 (10th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

961 F.2d 220

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

John JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.E. BRUCE, Director of Correctional Facility; Steven J.
Davies, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-3271.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 9, 1992.

Before JOHN P. MOORE, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant John Johnson appeals an order of the district court dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, Johnson contends that the defendants served him undercooked chicken and denied him medical attention, that the defendants denied him his right to free exercise of religion, and that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for discrimination and conspiracy without allowing discovery. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, GRANT Johnson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

961 F.2d 220

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

John JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.E. BRUCE, Director of Correctional Facility; Steven J.
Davies, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-3271.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 9, 1992.

Before JOHN P. MOORE, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant John Johnson appeals an order of the district court dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, Johnson contends that the defendants served him undercooked chicken and denied him medical attention, that the defendants denied him his right to free exercise of religion, and that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for discrimination and conspiracy without allowing discovery. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, GRANT Johnson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

961 F.2d 220, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19557, 1992 WL 73045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-johnson-jr-v-le-bruce-director-of-correctiona-ca10-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack