John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 1, 2011·No. 03-10-00182-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-10-00182-CV

John J. Rogers, Jr.; James R. Winton and Burl Richardson, Appellants



v.



Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-08-004634, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



The parties have filed a joint motion to abate this appeal pending settlement negotiations. The motion is GRANTED and the appeal is ABATED until October 28, 2011. The parties shall submit either a motion to reinstate or a joint status report concerning the status of settlement negotiations no later than October 28, 2011. Upon reinstatement, motions for rehearing will be due no later than the tenth (10th) date following reinstatement. The parties' alternative request for an extension of time to file motions for rehearing is dismissed as moot.



_______________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: September 1, 2011

Abated

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners (John J. Rogers, Jr. James R. Winton and Burl Richardson v. Texas Board of Architectural Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.