John J. McMullen Associates, Inc., a New York Corporation v. State Board of Higher Education, a Public Corporation of Oregon

406 F.2d 497
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 1969
Docket22225_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 406 F.2d 497 (John J. McMullen Associates, Inc., a New York Corporation v. State Board of Higher Education, a Public Corporation of Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John J. McMullen Associates, Inc., a New York Corporation v. State Board of Higher Education, a Public Corporation of Oregon, 406 F.2d 497 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal, the principal issue is whether the district court had jurisdiction to entertain this suit for patent infringement. It did not have jurisdiction, and the case must be taken to the Court of Claims, if the patented devises, used in research financed in part by National Science Foundation grants, were “used or manufactured by or for the United States” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1964).

For reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, reported in 268 F. Supp. 735, we hold that, in this particular case, the patented articles involved were made for or were being used by the United States, and that the claims of infringement must therefore be dismissed. However, we do not necessarily endorse the district court’s general statement that an interpretation of section 1498 which includes all research grants is “required.”

Rather than pass upon this general proposition, we restrict the holding to the facts of this case. Here, the patented articles were used in work of vital importance to the government. Additionally, the National Science Foundation grant appears to have been primarily a financing device for work of special interest to the United States Navy. Moreover, the ship employing the devices was used only for research approved and financed by the government.

While the above holding does not, in terms, dispose of plaintiff’s trademark claim, we regard that claim as frivolous and properly dismissed for that reason. The record indicates that the United States Navy and the National Science Foundation knew with whom they were dealing and that there was no confusion or palming off by reason of the use, by defendants, of a name similar to plaintiff’s trademark.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madey v. Duke University
413 F. Supp. 2d 601 (M.D. North Carolina, 2006)
Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United States
891 F. Supp. 1134 (E.D. Virginia, 1995)
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. Ostermann
534 F. Supp. 581 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Calloway v. United States
431 F. Supp. 1111 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 F.2d 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-j-mcmullen-associates-inc-a-new-york-corporation-v-state-board-of-ca9-1969.