John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson

Third Circuit

John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson

359 F.2d 435

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1966

Docket15615_1

StatusPublished

This text of 359 F.2d 435 (John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson, 359 F.2d 435 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Superior Court of Delaware has imposed a jail sentence upon the petitioner pursuant to a conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The petitioner has sought habeas corpus in the District Court for the District of Delaware alleging fundamental unfairness in his trial. In a careful opinion the District Court considered each point made by the petitioner and denied the writ. We agree that no error of constitutional dimension, no denial of due process of law, has been shown.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The Superior Court of Delaware has imposed a jail sentence upon the petitioner pursuant to a conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The petitioner has sought habeas corpus in the District Court for the District of Delaware alleging fundamental unfairness in his trial. In a careful opinion the District Court considered each point made by the petitioner and denied the writ. We agree that no error of constitutional dimension, no denial of due process of law, has been shown.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-j-halko-jr-v-raymond-w-anderson-ca3-1966.