John J. Guinan Contracting Co. v. Topeka Paving Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

John J. Guinan Contracting Co. v. Topeka Paving Co.

172 A.D. 929, 157 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 929 (John J. Guinan Contracting Co. v. Topeka Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John J. Guinan Contracting Co. v. Topeka Paving Co., 172 A.D. 929, 157 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

The issue relates entirely to the values of labor and materials, which fall under a few classes. The defendant, through its attorney, stated that it was willing to make admissions concerning such matters. Certainly, in view of the condition of the pleadings, aided by such proper concessions, a reference is not necessary. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The issue relates entirely to the values of labor and materials, which fall under a few classes. The defendant, through its attorney, stated that it was willing to make admissions concerning such matters. Certainly, in view of the condition of the pleadings, aided by such proper concessions, a reference is not necessary. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 929, 157 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-j-guinan-contracting-co-v-topeka-paving-co-nyappdiv-1916.