John J. Blake v. United States of America, No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

489 F.2d 1402
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1974
Docket1402
StatusPublished

This text of 489 F.2d 1402 (John J. Blake v. United States of America, No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John J. Blake v. United States of America, No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 489 F.2d 1402 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

489 F.2d 1402

John J. BLAKE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1974.

John J. Blake, pro se.

John L. Briggs, U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., D. Frank Winkles, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The denial of the appellant's motion to vacate the sentence is affirmed, and we adopt the thorough opinion of the district court which accompanied that denial. It is apparent from a careful reading of the record and the transcript of the appellant's probation revocation hearing that probation was revoked only after a full, fair, and impartial hearing at which Blake was represented by counsel. Without deciding whether the decision of the Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 1973, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656, should be applied retroactively, we are convinced by our examination of the record and the transcript that the requirements of that decision were fully met by the hearing held by the district court here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F.2d 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-j-blake-v-united-states-of-america-no-73-3345-summary-calendar-ca5-1974.