John J. Bagley & Co. v. Scudder

33 N.W. 47, 66 Mich. 97, 1887 Mich. LEXIS 454
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CAMPBELL, C. J.

^Respondent John Scudder appeals from an order holding him in contempt for not assigning to a receiver in a creditors’ bill. The receiver qualified March 10, 1886. After various delays, the circuit court for the county of Wayne, on October 27, made an order, after argument, that defendant assign. On the twenty-third of November an order was made to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt in not assigning. No sufficient cause being shown, he was so adjudged on the twenty-seventh of January, 1881.

Nothing is claimed in support of the appeal beyond certain alleged irregularities. We have not discovered anything of consequence; but we cannot review in this way the appointment of a receiver. If the court had granted the order with[98] out jurisdiction, the matter might have been brought here, perhaps, for correction. But defendant has been heard sufficiently in the cause in all its stages, and the appointment of a receiver was correct under the statute, which gives the judge broad discretion where an execution had been returned unsatisfied. We could not disturb it if so disposed, and we see no reason for doing so.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John J. Bagley & Co. v. Scudder, 33 N.W. 47, 66 Mich. 97, 1887 Mich. LEXIS 454 (Mich. 1887).

33 N.W. 47 (John J. Bagley & Co. v. Scudder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Miller
121 S.E. 113 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Carr v. District Court
126 N.W. 791 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)