John Hom v. United States

645 F. App'x 583
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
Docket13-17195
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 F. App'x 583 (John Hom v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Hom v. United States, 645 F. App'x 583 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John C. Horn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 26 U.S.C. § 7431(a)(1) action alleging that the United States improperly disclosed his tax return information in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6103. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Doe v. Abbott Labs., 571 F.3d 930, 933 (9th Cir.2009). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Horn’s action because Horn failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the disclosures were not made for purposes of tax administration or based on a good faith interpretation of § 6103. See 26 U.S.C. § 6103(h)(1) (disclosures may be made for purposes of tax administration); id. § 7431(b)(1) (precluding liability where a disclosure resulted from a good faith, but erroneous, interpretation of § 6103).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whistleblower 21276-13W v. Comm'r
147 T.C. No. 4 (U.S. Tax Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-hom-v-united-states-ca9-2016.