John Hoag And Della Hoag, Pets. v. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc., Res.

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided October 5, 2015·No. 73792-9·Unpublished

Opinion

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

JOHN HOAG and DELLA HOAG, husband and wife, and their marital No. 73792-9- community, r-1,

C~>.

Petitioners, DIVISION ONE 1

v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CAR WASH ENTERPRISES, INC., ro a Washington corporation or other business entity; and GARY KNIGHT and "PAT DOE" KNIGHT, and their marital community,

Respondents. FILED: October 5, 2015

PER CURIAM - John and Delia Hoag seek discretionary review under RAP 2.3(b)(1) of a July 7, 2015 trial court order denying their affidavit of prejudice and a July 15, 2015 order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the motion and answer, with appendices, and determined that review should be granted.

The trial court denied the Hoag's affidavit of prejudice on the ground that the court had made a discretionary ruling. But the order amending case schedule was before the court on a stipulation between the parties. See In re Marriage of Tve, 121 Wn. App. 817, 90 P.3d 1145 (2004), and State v. Parra. 122 Wn.2d 590, 859 P.2d 1231 (1993) (citing State ex rel. Floe v. Studebaker, 17 Wn.2d 8, 134 P.2d 718 (1943). Because the Hoags filed their affidavit of prejudice before the trial court made any

No. 73792-9-1/2

discretionary ruling, it was error to deny the affidavit of prejudice. Accordingly, the stay is lifted, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Reversed and remanded.

For the court:

y—t¥-—

T

TV; M c y /

l£=2-

•^J

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Hoag And Della Hoag, Pets. v. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc., Res., (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).

John Hoag And Della Hoag, Pets. v. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc., Res. (John Hoag And Della Hoag, Pets. v. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc., Res.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Parra
859 P.2d 1231 (Washington Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. DiLuzio
90 P.3d 1141 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
State Ex Rel. Floe v. Studebaker
134 P.2d 718 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
In re the Marriage of Tye
121 Wash. App. 817 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)