John Hightower, Jr. and Jessica Hightower v. Doug and Nancy Herms, Debbie Pruitt, Amy and Lance Warmke, and Brad and Ixarah Pranschke

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2017
Docket14-17-00420-CV
StatusPublished

This text of John Hightower, Jr. and Jessica Hightower v. Doug and Nancy Herms, Debbie Pruitt, Amy and Lance Warmke, and Brad and Ixarah Pranschke (John Hightower, Jr. and Jessica Hightower v. Doug and Nancy Herms, Debbie Pruitt, Amy and Lance Warmke, and Brad and Ixarah Pranschke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Hightower, Jr. and Jessica Hightower v. Doug and Nancy Herms, Debbie Pruitt, Amy and Lance Warmke, and Brad and Ixarah Pranschke, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Motion Granted, Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed September 19, 2017.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-17-00420-CV ____________

JOHN HIGHTOWER, JR. AND JESSICA HIGHTOWER, Appellants

V.

DOUG AND NANCY HERMS, DEBBIE PRUITT, AMY AND LANCE WARMKE, AND BRAD AND IXARAH PRANSCHKE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 335th District Court Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 36193

REINSTATEMENT ORDER

Appellants filed a motion for further review of orders entered in the trial court under Rule 29.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. A temporary injunction was signed on May 19, 2017. Appellants timely filed a notice of appeal. Subsequently, the trial court signed an order denying a motion to dissolve the temporary injunction on July 6, 2017. Additionally, on that same day, the trial court signed an amended order granting temporary injunction which supersedes the previous temporary injunction.

While an appeal from an interlocutory order is pending, on a party’s motion, the appellate court may review “a further appealable interlocutory order concerning the same subject matter.” Tex. R. App. P. 29.6(a)(1); Tanguy v. Laux, 259 S.W.3d 851, 854–56 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, no pet.). Accordingly, appellants’ motion is granted.

This case is REINSTATED and placed on the court’s active docket. Appellants’ supplemental brief is due 30 days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tanguy v. Laux
259 S.W.3d 851 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Hightower, Jr. and Jessica Hightower v. Doug and Nancy Herms, Debbie Pruitt, Amy and Lance Warmke, and Brad and Ixarah Pranschke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-hightower-jr-and-jessica-hightower-v-doug-and-nancy-herms-debbie-texapp-2017.