John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities

Court of Appeals of Texas

John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities

DecidedSeptember 16, 2015

Docket01-15-00413-CV

StatusPublished

This text of John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities (John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel; Members of Texas Board of Paroles, in their Individual Capacities

Appellate case number: 01-15-00413-CV

Trial court case number: 81239-I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

On May 4, 2015, appellant, John Henry Boykin, filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial court in the above-referenced matter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1). On May 15, 2015, appellant filed a motion to appeal as indigent in this Court. This Court referred the affidavit to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c). On June 24, 2015, the district clerk notified this Court that no contest to the affidavit of indigence was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e). Therefore, the allegations in the affidavit are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f).

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is indigent and is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f), (n). Appellant’s motion to appeal as indigent is denied as moot.

It is further ORDERED that Court Reporter file with this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order and at no cost to appellant, the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(k).

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED filed with this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, must be filed within 90 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 15, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel; Members of Texas Board of Paroles, in their Individual Capacities

Appellate case number: 01-15-00413-CV

Trial court case number: 81239-I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

On May 4, 2015, appellant, John Henry Boykin, filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial court in the above-referenced matter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c)(1). On May 15, 2015, appellant filed a motion to appeal as indigent in this Court. This Court referred the affidavit to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c). On June 24, 2015, the district clerk notified this Court that no contest to the affidavit of indigence was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e). Therefore, the allegations in the affidavit are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f).

The Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is indigent and is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f), (n). Appellant’s motion to appeal as indigent is denied as moot.

It is further ORDERED that Court Reporter file with this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order and at no cost to appellant, the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(k).

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED filed with this Court within 60 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, must be filed within 90 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 15, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

John Henry Boykin v. C. Tauss, L. Ruzicka, and F. Rangel Members of Texas Board of Paroles In Their Individual Capacities, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-henry-boykin-v-c-tauss-l-ruzicka-and-f-rangel-texapp-2015.