John Heathcoat & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

John Heathcoat & Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 371, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1746

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 1954

DocketNo. 57765; protest 211766-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 371 (John Heathcoat & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Heathcoat & Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 371, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1746 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of nets or nettings made on a bobbinet machine, wholly or in chief value of nylon, which nylon is similar in all material respects [372]*372to that the classification of which was involved in Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1366), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of nets or nettings made on a bobbinet machine, wholly or in chief value of nylon, which nylon is similar in all material respects [372]*372to that the classification of which was involved in Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1366), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Cust. Ct. 371, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-heathcoat-co-v-united-states-cusc-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack