John Hancock Life Insurance Company (u.S.A.) v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning Adjustment

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
DocketA16D0034
StatusPublished

This text of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (u.S.A.) v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning Adjustment (John Hancock Life Insurance Company (u.S.A.) v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (u.S.A.) v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning Adjustment, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 07, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0034. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.) v. CITY OF ATLANTA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, et al.

In January 2014, the City of Atlanta (“City”) notified petitioner John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (“John Hancock”) that a sign on its property violated two City ordinances. John Hancock challenged this determination before the City Board of Zoning Adjustment and the superior court, each of which issued decisions adverse to John Hancock. Before the superior court, John Hancock argued that the application of the relevant ordinances in this case violates its federal and state constitutional rights to free speech. John Hancock now seeks discretionary review of the superior court’s decision, again arguing that applying the City ordinances here violates its constitutional free speech rights. The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996) (citing Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II). Because John Hancock called into question the constitutionality of City ordinances, and the superior court specifically rejected those arguments, it appears that jurisdiction may lie in the Supreme Court. As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, Inc., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/07/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.
476 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane
469 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (u.S.A.) v. City of Atlanta Board of Zoning Adjustment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-hancock-life-insurance-company-usa-v-city-of--gactapp-2015.