John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling

690 So. 2d 635, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1814, 1997 WL 90821

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1679

StatusPublished

This text of 690 So. 2d 635 (John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling, 690 So. 2d 635, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1814, 1997 WL 90821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims correctly imposed attorney’s fees against appellants as a sanction due to their failure to comply with the judge’s prior order approving the parties’ agreement that appellants would pay certain medical bills, which remained unpaid. See Fla. R. Work. Comp. 4.150; § 440.33(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Cf. Horizon Healthcare v. Murphy, 660 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims correctly imposed attorney’s fees against appellants as a sanction due to their failure to comply with the judge’s prior order approving the parties’ agreement that appellants would pay certain medical bills, which remained unpaid. See Fla. R. Work. Comp. 4.150; § 440.33(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Cf. Horizon Healthcare v. Murphy, 660 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

690 So. 2d 635, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1814, 1997 WL 90821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-h-swisher-son-v-scantling-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack