John Grabinger and Robert Tovar v. James B. Conlisk, Jr.

455 F.2d 490, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11698
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 21, 1972·No. 71-1203·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue raised by this appeal is whether the district court properly dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986. The complaint challenged the propriety of the suspension from duty for fifteen days of the plaintiff police officers by the defendants because of plaintiffs’ disobedience *491 of their superiors’ order to submit to questioning monitored by polygraph without the presence of counsel concerning their alleged misconduct in the performance of their official duties.

We fully agree with the opinion of the district court, reported as Grabinger v. Conlisk, 320 F.Supp. 1213 (N.D.Ill. 1970), and we adopt and incorporate that opinion in its entirety.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Grabinger and Robert Tovar v. James B. Conlisk, Jr., 455 F.2d 490, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11698 (7th Cir. 1972).

455 F.2d 490 (John Grabinger and Robert Tovar v. James B. Conlisk, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sindermann v. CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF GURNEE
657 N.E.2d 41 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1995)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1990
Del Rivero v. Cahill
390 N.E.2d 355 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)
Confederation of Police v. City of Chicago
382 F. Supp. 624 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
Fitzgerald v. Cawley
368 F. Supp. 677 (S.D. New York, 1973)