John Gilbert Centeno Jr v. the State of Texas
This text of John Gilbert Centeno Jr v. the State of Texas (John Gilbert Centeno Jr v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00177-CR
John Gilbert CENTENO Jr, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024-CR-010971 The Honorable Benjamin Robertson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 6, 2026
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On April 15, 2025, appellant, pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, pled guilty to two
counts of repeated violation of a protective order and was placed on deferred adjudication
community supervision for seven years. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 25.072(e). On November 26,
2025, the State filed a motion to adjudicate appellant’s guilt and revoke his community
supervision. On January 29, 2026, the trial court signed an order modifying the conditions of 04-26-00177-CR
appellant’s community supervision. The next day, the State withdrew its motion to adjudicate guilt
and revoke community supervision. On February 26, 2026, appellant filed a notice of appeal.
“[A]ppeals from the modification of terms of deferred adjudication, like appeals from the
modification of terms of probation, are not authorized by the legislature.” Quaglia v. State, 906
S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.). “If anything, the decision to modify the
appellant’s deferred adjudication instead of proceeding with adjudication was part of the decision
whether to proceed with an adjudication of guilt, for which appeal is expressly forbidden.” Id.
On April 8, 2026, we issued an order advising appellant we lacked jurisdiction over this
appeal. We ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. See id. (dismissing appeal from order modifying terms of deferred adjudication
community supervision for lack of jurisdiction).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Gilbert Centeno Jr v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-gilbert-centeno-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.