John Fredrich Hickman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 18, 2012·No. 04-11-00794-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00794-CR

John Fredrich HICKMAN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CR-8297W Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 18, 2012

DISMISSED

On November 28, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record on or before December 28, 2011. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not respond. The record does not contain a certification

that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the 04-11-00794-CR

record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant;

therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Fredrich Hickman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

John Fredrich Hickman v. State (John Fredrich Hickman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)