John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State v. Tam Suey Jin

Ninth Circuit

John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State v. Tam Suey Jin

237 F.2d 500, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2929

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 1, 1956

Docket14947

StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 500 (John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State v. Tam Suey Jin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State v. Tam Suey Jin, 237 F.2d 500, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2929 (9th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dulles appeals from a decision sustaining Jin’s petition under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 1 to establish her United States nationality and citizenship. His contention is that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition because Jin failed to show that she had claimed a right or privilege of a national of the United States which had been denied by the State Department. It is not questioned that if the court had such jurisdiction the judgment must be affirmed. Dulles’ appeal was argued together with that in the case of Dulles v. Quan Yoke Fong, 9 Cir., 237 F.2d 496.

Jin, a girl born in China on April 28, 1941, filed an application with the Consul General at Hong Kong on May 6, 1952, for a passport or travel document to travel to the United States to join Tam Tong Gong, an American citizen she claimed to be her father. No action of any kind on her application was taken and it was ignored during a period of over seven months to December 22, 1952, when she filed her action under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940.

For the reasons stated in Dulles v. Fong, supra, we hold that the application for the passport or travel document was denied and that the court had jurisdiction to entertain her petition.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. Now 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dulles appeals from a decision sustaining Jin’s petition under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 1 to establish her United States nationality and citizenship. His contention is that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition because Jin failed to show that she had claimed a right or privilege of a national of the United States which had been denied by the State Department. It is not questioned that if the court had such jurisdiction the judgment must be affirmed. Dulles’ appeal was argued together with that in the case of Dulles v. Quan Yoke Fong, 9 Cir., 237 F.2d 496.

Jin, a girl born in China on April 28, 1941, filed an application with the Consul General at Hong Kong on May 6, 1952, for a passport or travel document to travel to the United States to join Tam Tong Gong, an American citizen she claimed to be her father. No action of any kind on her application was taken and it was ignored during a period of over seven months to December 22, 1952, when she filed her action under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940.

For the reasons stated in Dulles v. Fong, supra, we hold that the application for the passport or travel document was denied and that the court had jurisdiction to entertain her petition.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. Now 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 F.2d 500, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-foster-dulles-as-secretary-of-state-v-tam-suey-jin-ca9-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack