John Folmer v. State
This text of John Folmer v. State (John Folmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0320-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL E
SEPTEMBER 19, 2003 ______________________________
JOHN FOLMER,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 106TH DISTRICT COURT OF LYNN COUNTY;
NO. 02-2605; HON. CARTER T. SCHILDKNECHT, PRESIDING _______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., QUINN, J., and BOYD, S.J. 1
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Appellant John Folmer appeals his conviction for the offense of theft over $1,500.
The reporter’s record is due in this cause, and an extension of the applicable deadline was
sought. To justify the extension, the court reporter represented that appellant has failed
to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record. Nothing of record appears showing
whether the appellant is indigent and entitled to a free record.
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Re t.), Seventh C ourt of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.00 2(a)(1) (V erno n Su pp. 2003 ). Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 106th District
Court of Lynn County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
to determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,
2. whether appellant is indigent.
The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings
of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed
a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all
orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed
a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the
aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental
record with the clerk of this court on or before October 17, 2003. Should further time be
needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before
October 17, 2003.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Folmer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-folmer-v-state-texapp-2003.