John Folmer v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2003
Docket07-03-00320-CR
StatusPublished

This text of John Folmer v. State (John Folmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Folmer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0320-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

SEPTEMBER 19, 2003 ______________________________

JOHN FOLMER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee _________________________________

FROM THE 106TH DISTRICT COURT OF LYNN COUNTY;

NO. 02-2605; HON. CARTER T. SCHILDKNECHT, PRESIDING _______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., QUINN, J., and BOYD, S.J. 1

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant John Folmer appeals his conviction for the offense of theft over $1,500.

The reporter’s record is due in this cause, and an extension of the applicable deadline was

sought. To justify the extension, the court reporter represented that appellant has failed

to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record. Nothing of record appears showing

whether the appellant is indigent and entitled to a free record.

1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Re t.), Seventh C ourt of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.00 2(a)(1) (V erno n Su pp. 2003 ). Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 106th District

Court of Lynn County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,

2. whether appellant is indigent.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings

of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all

orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed

a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record with the clerk of this court on or before October 17, 2003. Should further time be

needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before

October 17, 2003.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Folmer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-folmer-v-state-texapp-2003.