John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen
67 N.C. 345
Opinion
The only question necessary for us to consider, is, was notice to the adverse party, of the motion to vacate the judgment, necessary. Notice was necessary, and the order vacating the judgment without notice was erroneous.
Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen, 67 N.C. 345 (N.C. 1872).
67 N.C. 345 (John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher v. CID Copper Mining Co.
10 S.E. 1055 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Sutton v. . McMillan
72 N.C. 102 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)