John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen
67 N.C. 345
This text of 67 N.C. 345 (John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
John F. Seymour & Co. v. Cohen, 67 N.C. 345 (N.C. 1872).
Opinion
The only question necessary for us to consider, is, was notice to the adverse party, of the motion to vacate the judgment, necessary. Notice was necessary, and the order vacating the judgment without notice was erroneous.
Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fisher v. CID Copper Mining Co.
10 S.E. 1055 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
Sutton v. . McMillan
72 N.C. 102 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
67 N.C. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-f-seymour-co-v-cohen-nc-1872.