John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 11, 2022
Docket14-22-00215-CV
StatusPublished

This text of John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV (John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00215-CV

JOHN F. DIETZ, Appellant

V.

4J ENERGY, LLC AND ENERGIA INER S. DE R.L. DE CV, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-68508

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed December 27, 2021 dismissing appellee 4J Energy, LLC’s (“4J Energy”) claims against John F. Dietz without prejudice. The appellate record reflects that when that order was signed, 4J Energy’s claim against appellee Energia Iner S. de R.L. de CV (“Energia”) for fraud remained pending, as did appellant John F. Dietz’s cross-claim against Energia for reimbursement and indemnification. That order is accordingly not an appealable final judgment, and the appellate record does not reflect that the trial court has otherwise issued an appealable final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). The appealed- from order also lacks any apparent basis for being immediately appealable. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the general rule that “interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable”).

On September 15, 2022, this court informed the parties of the apparent lack of jurisdiction over this appeal and warned them that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless any party demonstrated this court had jurisdiction. The parties filed no response to the letter. Accordingly, due to the lack of any basis for exercising jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CMH HOMES v. Perez
340 S.W.3d 444 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-f-dietz-v-4j-energy-llc-and-energia-iner-s-de-rl-de-cv-texapp-2022.