John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV
This text of John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV (John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00215-CV
JOHN F. DIETZ, Appellant
V.
4J ENERGY, LLC AND ENERGIA INER S. DE R.L. DE CV, Appellees
On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-68508
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from an order signed December 27, 2021 dismissing appellee 4J Energy, LLC’s (“4J Energy”) claims against John F. Dietz without prejudice. The appellate record reflects that when that order was signed, 4J Energy’s claim against appellee Energia Iner S. de R.L. de CV (“Energia”) for fraud remained pending, as did appellant John F. Dietz’s cross-claim against Energia for reimbursement and indemnification. That order is accordingly not an appealable final judgment, and the appellate record does not reflect that the trial court has otherwise issued an appealable final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). The appealed- from order also lacks any apparent basis for being immediately appealable. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the general rule that “interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable”).
On September 15, 2022, this court informed the parties of the apparent lack of jurisdiction over this appeal and warned them that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless any party demonstrated this court had jurisdiction. The parties filed no response to the letter. Accordingly, due to the lack of any basis for exercising jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John F Dietz v. 4J Energy, LLC and Energia Iner S. De R.L. De CV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-f-dietz-v-4j-energy-llc-and-energia-iner-s-de-rl-de-cv-texapp-2022.