John F. Deonarine v. Lopez

District Court, C.D. California·Decided May 10, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-03353·Unknown

Opinion

NOTE: CHANG ES MADE BY THE COURT

CASE NO. 2:22-03353 JLS (ADS) JOHN F. DEONARINE, Plaintiff vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER LOPEZ, et al. Defendants. I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS1 A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth’s Procedures. this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section XIII(C), below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. A. This action involves Officer Aguilar, Officer Rosales, and Lt. McNulty, and Officer Morales (“Defendants”). Plaintiff is seeking materials and information that Defendants maintain as confidential, such as Internal Affairs materials and information, video recordings, audio recordings, and information, personnel records and other administrative materials and information currently in the possession of Defendants which may be entitled to special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. Additionally, discovery may include sensitive confidential financial and business information, which may require heightened protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. This also includes (1) any information copied or extracted from the Confidential information; (2) copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations of Confidential information; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations that are reasonably likely to reveal Confidential information. III. DEFINITIONS A. Action: this pending federal lawsuit. B. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. This also includes (1) any information copied or extracted from the Confidential information; (2) copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations of Confidential information; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations that are reasonably likely to reveal Confidential information. References to “CONFIDENTIAL” information or items in this Protective Order shall also include information or items designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” unless stated otherwise. D. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. G. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. H. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. I. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. J. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. K. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). L. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. M. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. N. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” O. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. A. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that are reasonably likely to reveal Protected Material. B. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. FINAL DISPOSITION of the action is defined as the conclusion of any appellate proceedings, or, if no appeal is taken, when the time for filing of an appeal has run. Except as set forth below, the terms of this protective order apply through FINAL DISPOSITION of the action. The parties may stipulate that the they will be contractually bound by the terms of this agreement beyond FINAL DISPOSITION, but will have to file a separate action for enforcement of the agreement once all proceedings in this case are complete. Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180-81 (distinguishing “good cause”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John F. Deonarine v. Lopez, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

John F. Deonarine v. Lopez (John F. Deonarine v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.