John Ernest Lucas v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

377 F.2d 556, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 1967
Docket24349
StatusPublished

This text of 377 F.2d 556 (John Ernest Lucas v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Ernest Lucas v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 377 F.2d 556, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

377 F.2d 556

John Ernest LUCAS, Appellant,
v.
Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 24349.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 9, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Allen B. Hannay, Judge.

Will Gray, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Lonny F. Zwiener, Gilbert J. Pena, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., Robert E. Owen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Staff Legal Asst. Atty. Gen., R. L. (Bob) Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A careful consideration of the record of the trial and of the habeas corpus hearing in the district court convinces us that the denial of the writ below was correct.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 F.2d 556, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-ernest-lucas-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-texa-ca5-1967.