John Eric Anderson v. State of Texas And
Opinion
Adin Eric Auheesonw _. 3 SEN THE 48%. PiaddtPE, $ _ pistatel bout Vs, 8 Temi Poudty er % Te vas [MSMR A Prive | _ Steve of Tews Ss a Defendant 3 Cause No. pe \-GN-35-O1tES_ —_______ MOTION To entoer sreddicton Now Comes 2 Abbn Fer - Padotcone, ewe Noval” a tho Files +nai Mohn to EeCoece Tuendichion, po — Motion te Ceguest Enfooumedt oF Vne pouct OE appeals Avelodiciac, Da suunpaeh, dye. Movant. coil, shou to a — - Taasde Aton
Pa IvE lL
_Movewh Files Ais moto puesuret je Teepe
Rule Pa JOEL
LL. Facts —
A. A Audge Sitting Fok the WB-+ik bishaxt owt oF Tels bounhy Tews, A audge sic, ‘Don Puieness ,
Rendeged A Riel OgdeR Mn LAusé WO, D-1-GN-35-O0\988
on tne 3st daw of Auly LOdS |
A The Movant desiees +o appeal Yhat oader,
ord Fede notice of Appeal with Yhe Tels a
County disheict Alegk on. August ded JOOS
aah
__ {TRAC asa).
3. 1 he. Movent eequested F “eaclinge, dE Frcbs
end __Loaclusions OF Law on Reausr ah 2035 _
4. The movant ENed, Request fee Omittal oe a Add iKioval Findings OF Facts and Corclusions af Lav
on Crrcust d2-End does
5. The Movant F2 ated - TR, 2p. Bile IV, Time
Ae _sead & a DE Fotis td tondustos OE Lie,
ceacaaadiaksenamndehtismentite Pa ‘3 0Fl’e
ler Movent Reteived 9 Freod pedeg on his _ REQUEST FoR Finlivas OF Fads and londustos . OF LAL, PuRsudwt do Tee Rule IAle - ; (Oener STATINA denied) \. TRACP Cute Ab ATATES, . Keach Cequest Shall Ge Entetel) _ ui. A Lourrent _ Movent is enhtled to Fle en apptel by lave (TRAP 25 i). Nokes © © Appeal, nao been FsNad , at Vveouds Be20e,, ngalect, og despegetion Covet Qeksonnel SEEM nor YX be doira wer 1S ~< REdquiged hy Newt “eo alow Moved tes proted on = Appel in Whe 1Sth lou oF appads. = Li dudge Dow Buegess of Tees honky hes pen ed d_plainhtes Request Foe ack, Frnclicgs _ Erdem and bouclustons OF fA,
Pa Ly ve le 8k Appointed Seniog Au Nowe: HSAh Courh sitting Foe the 48+ Desheedk
Covet on Sly Bist aves: has ecfused to |
File: Findings OF Fads and Condlustas oF
LAS, DEK muy LArctul Request oF August Hod
DOS,
3. Even when promoted on. 8-33-3035, undee Tex. RCS. Paoe Rule 398, dudae
Don Bueges hee not ech wo
4. Parnpted OME Agata by plow TF pelee
In ne Aik week OF Coeut. W035, hy Tex. @ Lf iV. Cove, Ride FAN, Time. te > send
_ Fradliags DF Fach and _ hon clusions DE brome
Non & \ Ruregecs - ov Wwe
Py sor
IV. Remedy / Ceayer
EF am Requesting,
= ( onclusing OE jw Teom Aud QE Non Buea ESS
\, f\ dene Penditiouw DE Etcdlings DE Fact rad
iw Cause No. D-4-GN-35 -pn1ae iw We
a 42 +n Aishetch Louw dE “VeAuts Cou
AS
Foun ERic Andéespn
LE Blane Unit 3 dg bine
DAS FM 354 _
a Rzaunnont Teyas Atos
Pea lo DOE le
TE, AOhn Eple Ancdeeson currently betax
_tncaeeeemted te Hye TEyts Qepeet mew
OF Pemind Aust System undee EN :
7 # 00553) lo in AEFFECsOn hountuy _ Teyas, do eeu ste under a _Poove ave _teue wrod soeect 4 to Ye - bef of my beer.
ee _ FAbhn Eew Audeeson
__ a A SSI
oe 9- 2-3035 |
Ceghibiowte DE Seeutee
rm allal a te = topy DE Nha modtim oo - Arto Pong Azct, AX
ME AS +h Cougt OF Ages -335 oo PO ADK 1395}. Qushh tT Ee ASL
PD. Roy \3SU@ Auch evks WON 35UB
Ae tue boggy DE his motion Soo
4-3-3095 Bugs Em BS
oe AE lave Unit 36a b (OB
fdY EUs lofyg fy Hof lyf Eto ng faded gtyggedptlocdgtegays ESE
1 La ‘ syha! wyory
€G3E\ XWM'A'?) SEE - ye70y) 4Q ywrAD yyy es 3h4
) cele et nm , . ONS !
iv
a MYaTO
ANIdd “W HAHdOLSIBHO
G202 69 dS
Svxal ‘NUSNY STWaddv 40 LHNOD WSL NI GHAMOFN
hSS Ws Gb.
sy SO VY OOMAD 27 -A\--9) Bpyw & yey? 2 DINLSG =e
Moszaoty Pas VUGE Se ea asien “qu AtLoauHNoo - FOILSAS E aWNiKieo oo LEE Luvdsd r SVXEL AS o. i o5dSNi LON : TEVA uad Nadi0 03.94 TLALUd
a tic eeinanne brant iS teen Ss
perk ae
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John Eric Anderson v. State of Texas And (John Eric Anderson v. State of Texas And) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.