John Enoch v. State of Texas
This text of John Enoch v. State of Texas (John Enoch v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 04-01-00275-CR
Opinion by: Alma L. López, Justice
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2002
AFFIRMED
John Enoch ("Enoch") pled guilty to murder. Enoch's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Enoch with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
Alma L. López, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Enoch v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-enoch-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2002.