John Enoch v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 10, 2002·No. 04-01-00275-CR·Published

Opinion

No. 04-01-00275-CR

John ENOCH,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2000CR3456
Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Alma L. López, Justice

Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2002

AFFIRMED

John Enoch ("Enoch") pled guilty to murder. Enoch's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Enoch with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

Alma L. López, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Enoch v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

John Enoch v. State of Texas (John Enoch v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Nichols v. State
954 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)