John Edward Rago v. State
This text of John Edward Rago v. State (John Edward Rago v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2015
NO. 03-13-00798-CR
John Edward Rago, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIIN
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the “Finding on Deadly
Weapon” is “YES, NOT A FIREARM.” In addition, the Court modifies the trial court’s
judgment to reflect an affirmative finding of family violence. The judgment, as modified, is
affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is
made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Edward Rago v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-edward-rago-v-state-texapp-2015.