John Edward Hagensick v. State
This text of John Edward Hagensick v. State (John Edward Hagensick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-17-00499-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JOHN EDWARD HAGENSICK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Rodriguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam Appellant’s appointed counsel, Chris Iles, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw
as counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, counsel has recently discovered a
conflict of interest and requests new appellate counsel be appointed.
Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel
rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the
appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with
a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of
this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court
for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed
attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to
new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge
appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall
enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be
appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number
of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial
court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be
filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of
this order.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 2nd day of January, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Edward Hagensick v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-edward-hagensick-v-state-texapp-2018.