John Edward Dimas v. Joe Ibarra Puente
This text of John Edward Dimas v. Joe Ibarra Puente (John Edward Dimas v. Joe Ibarra Puente) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00639-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
JOHN EDWARD DIMAS, Appellant,
v.
NOE IBARRA PUENTE, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, John Edward Dimas, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2649-12-G. The
parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have
reached an agreement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request that this Court dismiss this case without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the
validity of the temporary injunctions in any contempt proceeding.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss
without prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed
without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the validity of the temporary injunctions in
any contempt proceeding. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are
taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement
of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. See TEX. R. APP.
P.18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the
mandate immediately.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 29th day of November, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Edward Dimas v. Joe Ibarra Puente, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-edward-dimas-v-joe-ibarra-puente-texapp-2012.