John Edward Daugherty v. R. K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections
This text of 456 F.2d 97 (John Edward Daugherty v. R. K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John E. Daugherty, a California state prisoner, brought this civil action against the Director of the California Department of Corrections and certain prison wardens, guards, and administrators alleging deprivation of his civil rights. His complaint, which was filed in the Northern District of California, was dismissed for improper venue and failure to state a claim.
All the defendants reside in the Eastern District of California, and the claim *98 arose in that district. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue in non-diversity actions is proper “ . . . only in the judicial district where all defendants reside, or in which the claim arose . . .” Therefore, venue was improper in the Northern District, and the complaint should have been dismissed without prejudice to Daughtery’s renewing his suit in the proper district.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 F.2d 97, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-edward-daugherty-v-r-k-procunier-director-of-the-department-of-ca9-1972.