John Edward Daugherty v. R. K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections

456 F.2d 97, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11040
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 29, 1972·No. 71-2492·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John E. Daugherty, a California state prisoner, brought this civil action against the Director of the California Department of Corrections and certain prison wardens, guards, and administrators alleging deprivation of his civil rights. His complaint, which was filed in the Northern District of California, was dismissed for improper venue and failure to state a claim.

All the defendants reside in the Eastern District of California, and the claim *98 arose in that district. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue in non-diversity actions is proper “ . . . only in the judicial district where all defendants reside, or in which the claim arose . . .” Therefore, venue was improper in the Northern District, and the complaint should have been dismissed without prejudice to Daughtery’s renewing his suit in the proper district.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Edward Daugherty v. R. K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections, 456 F.2d 97, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11040 (9th Cir. 1972).

456 F.2d 97 (John Edward Daugherty v. R. K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Crisp
444 F. Supp. 31 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1977)
Harley v. Oliver
400 F. Supp. 105 (W.D. Arkansas, 1975)