John Edward Daugherty v. California
Opinion
87 S.Ct. 1033
18 L.Ed.2d 40
John Edward DAUGHERTY
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 19, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 13, 1967
John Edward Daugherty, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
386 U.S. 271 (John Edward Daugherty v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.