John Earl Alford v. United States
Opinion
375 F.2d 773
John Earl ALFORD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21196.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 5, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.
Martin F. Bloom, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and HALBERT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal, based solely on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, is completely without merit. It approaches the frivolous.
We affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
375 F.2d 773 (John Earl Alford v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.