John Earl Alford v. United States

Ninth Circuit

John Earl Alford v. United States

375 F.2d 773, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6857

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1967

Docket21196_1

StatusPublished

This text of 375 F.2d 773 (John Earl Alford v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Earl Alford v. United States, 375 F.2d 773, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6857 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

375 F.2d 773

John Earl ALFORD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21196.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 5, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.

Martin F. Bloom, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and HALBERT, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, based solely on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, is completely without merit. It approaches the frivolous.

We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI