John E. Reinhardt Plumbing, Inc. v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

John E. Reinhardt Plumbing, Inc. v. Norris

714 P.2d 1118, 78 Or. App. 243

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 12, 1986

Docket83-1425; CA A34236

StatusPublished

This text of 714 P.2d 1118 (John E. Reinhardt Plumbing, Inc. v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John E. Reinhardt Plumbing, Inc. v. Norris, 714 P.2d 1118, 78 Or. App. 243 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, a subcontractor, seeks to recover from defendants Iwasaki on a theory of unjust enrichment for amounts that it alleges it was not paid by the general contractor for work done on the Iwasakis’ residence. Defendants moved for summary judgment (supported by an affidavit) on plaintiffs amended complaint. Plaintiffs answering affidavit did not show any material issue of fact which would support its claim of unjust enrichment, and there was no error in granting the motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, a subcontractor, seeks to recover from defendants Iwasaki on a theory of unjust enrichment for amounts that it alleges it was not paid by the general contractor for work done on the Iwasakis’ residence. Defendants moved for summary judgment (supported by an affidavit) on plaintiffs amended complaint. Plaintiffs answering affidavit did not show any material issue of fact which would support its claim of unjust enrichment, and there was no error in granting the motion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

714 P.2d 1118, 78 Or. App. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-e-reinhardt-plumbing-inc-v-norris-orctapp-1986.